|  The Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) conducted 
                inspections of UBS Warburg Securities (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch 
                (UBS Securities) and Commerz Securities (Japan) Company Limited, 
                Tokyo Branch (Commerz Securities), based on provisions of the 
                Law on Foreign Securities Firms (LFSF), and found legal violations 
                by employees of the both companies as described below.
 Today, the SESC sent recommendations to the Prime Minister and 
                the Commissioner of Financial Services Agency (FSA) to take appropriate 
                actions pursuant to Article 20(1) of the FSA Establishment Law. Act of making a series of securities transactions to create artificial 
                market prices which does not reflect the actual state of the market 
              UBS SecuritiesIn relation to an Equity Exchangeable Bond (EB) for stocks of 
                  a listed company, for the purpose of lowering the stock price, 
                  an equities trader sold the stocks by placing a series of lower 
                  limit or no limit orders from 14:59 until the close on May 10, 
                  2000. In fact whether additional interests (bonus coupon) of 
                  the EB were payable was dependent upon the stock price on the 
                  very date of May 10, 2000. As a consequence of the deliberate 
                  selling, the stock price fell short of the benchmark price for 
                  additional interests, and the payment worth approximately 70 
                  million-yen could be avoided.
 
Commerz SecuritiesIn relation to another EB for stocks of a listed company, for 
                  the purpose of lowering the stock price, equities traders sold 
                  the stocks by placing a series of lower limit orders from 14:58 
                  until the close on August 15, 2000. In fact whether additional 
                  interests (bonus coupon) of the EB were payable was dependent 
                  upon the stock price on the very date of August 15, 2000. As 
                  a consequence of the deliberate selling, the stock price fell 
                  short of the benchmark price for additional interests, and the 
                  payment worth approximately 77 million-yen could be avoided.?(Violation 
                  of a Ministerial Ordinance, Article 42(1)(ix) of the Security 
                  and Exchange Law including the application of Article 14(1) 
                  of the LFSF)
 |