| 1. | Perspectives for the review 
 
 
      
        | (1) | Major items to be considered 
          Consideration of the need to further articulate the basic nature of the Financial 
            Inspection Manuals
 
 
              
                |  | For example: Consider the comment that the Financial Inspection Manuals 
                would be legally binding on financial institutions (clarify the manualsf nature as a 
                non-binding handbook for use by inspectors and their relationship with administrative 
                measures that might be taken as a result of inspections). 
 
 | Further consideration on how best to assure the effectiveness of risk management systems 
            (including the role of the board of directors), from the perspective of financial 
            supervision.
 
 
              
                |  | For example: Consider the comment that allowances should be made for 
                delegation of responsibility for risk management etc. to sub-committees under the board of 
                directors. 
 
 | Consideration of the need to take account of the issue of a credit contraction, since 
            there have been worries expressed that the application of the Financial Inspection Manuals 
            might lead to a contraction of credit, including lending to smaller businesses.
 
Consideration of the need for differentiation in the contents of check points according 
            to the size and nature of the financial institution under inspection.
 
Consideration of the merits of individual arguments made in other comments.
 
 
 |  
        | (2) | Basic considerations in the review process 
 
 The review should assume that the nature of the Financial Inspection Manuals is 
        that of a handbook for inspectors, and should take account of the following 
        considerations.
 
 
          Recovery of domestic and foreign confidence in the Japanese financial system 
 
 
              
                |  | Japan must establish financial administration and financial institution 
                management that takes account of international perspectives and is also acceptable to 
                depositors and taxpayers, in order to stabilize and revitalize the Japanese financial 
                system, and to restore the domestic and foreign confidence in Japanese financial 
                institutions. The Financial Inspection Manuals are expected to serve this end, through an 
                enhancement of the inspection and supervisory regime. 
 |  
          Establishment of financial institution management based on the principle of 
            self-accountability
 
 
              
                |  | Financial institutions are private companies. The role of financial 
                authorities is to use inspections to encourage financial institutions to engage in 
                appropriate internal management based on the principle of that the financial institution 
                itself is ultimately accountable for its actions. 
 
 | Assurance of smooth supplies of funding and appropriate risk management
 
 
              
                |  | The role of financial institutions is to engage in necessary risk taking 
                while appropriately managing their risks. Financial authorities should encourage through 
                inspections the smooth supply of funding to borrowers engaged in sound business 
                activities, while also ensuring the soundness of financial-institution operations. 
 
 | Establishment of transparent, rule-based inspection and administration 
 
 
              
                |  | Financial authorities should, through the publication of the Financial 
                Inspection Manuals, eliminate discretionary measures wherever possible, seeking instead to 
                establish fair and transparent inspection and administrative regimes based on clearly 
                articulated rules. 
 
 
 |  |  |